[Gary Okupant]

The BAR; doesn't have to speak? Anyone show me in "Law", thats the constitution that Lawyers/Counselors "Speak". They donot! You speak, I speak; with "counsel". "I, you, we" speak and confront and speak. I have as of yet; seen NO ruling in which the "Bar in the lawyer" speaks! As the monoply speaks; and the Court is established by Statue, Constitution; and the Court writes the "Administrative Law"; for implementation of the "Law". and practice thereof; the BAR is paid by taxpayers.
The Taxpayer; therefore is entitled to taxpayer funded coverage; as the taxpayer; gave voice to the Constitution to implement the administration "of" the Constitution.

I had a DEFENSE LAWYER; resign on me; and the court approved! The next week when I arrived in court; with NO counsel; the same lawyer who was allowed to leave and NOT represent me; was assigned by the same JUDGE to provide counsel to "me". Go figure. As a Pro Se; "I", voice at any time concern for process and sovereign rights inalienable to me by the Constitution. Now administrative law may not change by adding too or removing the wording and meaning of "MY" Constitution. The Ohio Constitution again also stipulates "Counsel"; as "I" confront.

There is NO requirement for a lawyer! Only an implied threat that "one" representing onesself; may only lose.

I await; the evidence that "I" may not succeed without proper legal representation.

Am "I" missing something here?