Thread: Right to Travel
View Single Post
  #22  
Old 12-28-2006, 10:54 PM
ndusa's Avatar
ndusa ndusa is offline
Banned User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: INSANITY
Posts: 687
Quote:
Originally Posted by ezrhythm
1. Right, unrestrained use not encompassed. Driving/operating with "for hire", passengers and/or cargo is restrained.

2. Correct, to "drive" as the vehicle codes define drive, is not a right as opposed to traveling, which is a right.

I'm sorry, is that what the Supreme court said? I don't think so! If you are behind the wheel, you ass is grass in Montana. People like the "freeman" tried this crap, and it never has, and never will hold up in MOntana, no judge thinks like you, nor will you find any jury to buy this crap.

Now, instead of giving your "theory" which doesn't mean a damn thing in law, show us a case where I'm wrong in Montana. (I won't be holding my breath thats for sure!) NOBODY HAS EVER, I DO MEAN EVER, WON THIS LOONY THEORY IN MONTANA AND NEVER, EVER WILL.
__________________
yet another dead persona by

Scooterdog / NDUSA / Daywalker / IDOKNOW / theincubus / calfkilla / daisygirl / dochendrix / jdkross / sunlesswonder / skeptic62

Is it any wonder I was perm banned?
Reply With Quote