Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ezrhythm
1. Right, unrestrained use not encompassed. Driving/operating with "for hire", passengers and/or cargo is restrained.
2. Correct, to "drive" as the vehicle codes define drive, is not a right as opposed to traveling, which is a right.
|
I'm sorry, is that what the Supreme court said? I don't think so! If you are behind the wheel, you ass is grass in Montana. People like the "freeman" tried this crap, and it never has, and never will hold up in MOntana, no judge thinks like you, nor will you find any jury to buy this crap.
Now, instead of giving your "theory" which doesn't mean a damn thing in law, show us a case where I'm wrong in Montana. (I won't be holding my breath thats for sure!) NOBODY HAS EVER, I DO MEAN EVER, WON THIS LOONY THEORY IN MONTANA AND NEVER, EVER WILL.