Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ezrhythm
The words; driving and "unrestricted traveling" are used purposefully otherwise they would come right out and say, "All automobile use on public roads is restricted." Or, "All use of the common ways are/can be regulated."
The very fact that we are having this discussion indicates that the courts haven't and can't plainly say, "You have no right to travel."
In fact, because we do have the right to travel, they have to make up the category of "person" just so that they can trick people in to attaching themselves to such catagory in order to regulate/control the deceived population.
|
LOL, oh yes they tell you that you don't have a right to drive! You can call it travel, if your behind the wheel, your dead in the water.
Instead of thinking that you're argueing something new, go do some research, read EVERY case decided in Montana, every stupid arguement has been made, and if you look further, you can call yourself person, man, woman, its all the same in montana.
Matter of fact, why don't you come up to Montana, rip the plates off your "vehicle", get rid of your DL, and do 100mph down a road, then when you get out of jail in a year of so, come back and tell us about it.