Somebody has noticed the mortgage schedule for their home is a coupon too. The redemption authorization is looking awfully good.
There are some things one should be aware of so as not to be disappointed in the results. First I was not expecting this paper to function as it did. It however spoke the truth about double-enrichment but I was not expecting Chase to deliver a Statement as such an obvious admission.
Second, the Statement makes it look like one can press this $15,000 credit limit monthly. Somebody else put together the threats about double-enrichment but his communications skills were hurried or poor - a few big runon sentences that when studied failed to make sense. But there were some components missing too.* That last paragraph is important. The suitor I am sure followed my advice and destroyed his Chase cards. Too tempting.
You only get to use this redemption technique one time if at all. If you use it and then sell your good faith and credit through the private credit system in the future - your endorsement will be guaranteed - by yourself!**
So you better understand a little about the bonding system based in the legal or true name and birth certificate as a bank note before you dabble in coupon redemption. You better understand that this fellow who got the Chase Statement has been using his true name for years - albeit sometimes to operate dba in commerce. By signing properly "dba" then he limits any and all presumptions that can be made lawfully against him. But by understanding why he signs "dba" is the key to doing so successfully.
Contemplate why Judge Roy Bean, an active registered attorney in a black robe calls me Van Pelt. Comprehend why Demosthenes jumped on the full name, albeit not mine, for the title of her thread...
http://www.quatloos.com/Tax-Forums/v....php?t=1007038
And understand the timing too. Always understand the timing (linked below) -
http://www.quatloos.com/Tax-Forums/v...007033&start=0 . Demosthenes tipped her hand upon Judge Roy Bean's lead - they do not understand that US Notes are still available in public money. If they do they desperately keep that esoteric of the Bar. When they saw me mention my fee, they thought that an admission of taxable income in the private credit and private law system of the Federal Reserve.
I would be disappointed in myself if somebody lost their home offering the coupon for redemption, simply because I did not explain about what character can claim bad faith because they are heir apparent to the original estate.
Regards,
David Merrill.
* Last night somebody called me saying they heard I had been indicted. I assured that that was just Demosthenes' revival of a decade old rumor - a vacant prosecution. I called his source and he forwarded an email from a man who is described as psychotic. Maybe so but when he wanted me to draft him remedy he kept saying things that threw me and I refused to help him. He became very angry with me and was warned by people to quit spreading lies about me. That must have been five years ago.
He wrote the email with the indictments newspaper article Demosthenes has revived, and to the author of the rough draft of the coupon redemption. [Sometimes advanced resonance is quite amazing.] His point was that I do not know my own name! "Even his name is not real."
** With a card what are they gonna do? Take your card? Threaten your credit - they tried that and the suitor refused for cause. The first thing Chase did was threaten full Collection on the account - something that is usually an impossible thing for someone extended to do. But with a home as collateral, one better be very careful to be able to save the home (new financing from a rich relative for instance) unless you are headed for a foreclosure anyway.
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/tim...strategy-1.jpg
http://ecclesia.org/forum/images/tim...strategy-2.jpg