Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Notorial dissent
Why don't we try for the real, and easy answer, called sloppy set decoration.
The flags were poorly displayed.
The tops and bottoms of the flags being masked by the Army banners to the sides.
I personally think whoever did it should have been embarrassed by the lack of quality in their work,
All it signifies however is sloppiness.
|
Thank you for your opinion, once again forwarded as fact.
That is the best you can do?
Man, that is a real stretch.
I come from a very highly honored and distinguished military family that goes way back.
The Army does not tolerate sloppiness or any other impropriety with flag etiquette.
Especially with flag etiquette.
The Army will not tolerate improper display of the flag.
The United States Army does not consider the flag as "set decoration," under any circumstances.
Had any member of the Army done the work, or was responsible for overseeing the work missed an inappropriate or "sloppy" display of the flag, that soldier would have been far more than merely "embarrassed."
That is a Fort of the United States Army, it is not a "set."
The flags are not "set decoration."
The only set decoration is the court appointed
pretender.