View Single Post
  #1  
Old 08-21-2004, 10:03 AM
HenryBowman
 
Posts: n/a
Legal Documentation Question

I need input on this one.



Earlier last year, we "paid up" to avoid foreclosure.



I still have the paperwork, and am thus preparing for what is to come.



Here is some verbage that don't quite jive, and I'd like opinions on it.



In the first paragraph, it reads:



"1. The name and address of the current holder of the above-described Deed of Trust and the indebtedness secured thereby is: BANK NAME AND ADDRESS HERE. You have the right to appear before the Clerk of Superior Court for XXXXXX County at this hearing at which time you shall be afforded the opportunity to show cause as to why the foreclosure should not be allowed to proceed. If you do not intend to contest the Holder's allegations of default....."



See how they didn't attach the Title of "Holder" to the Bank, but they then start referring to the "Holder?"



I have always seen and used the following in my docs, and I need to know the basis for this protocol.



The BANK NAME, hereinafter "Holder".... is how it should read, right?



They didn't follow the protocol I have seen, and in this case I know why. They are not the Note Holder. Freddie Mac is probably the Note Holder. But they don't say that they are the Note holder. They say that they are the holder of the DOT and the indebtedness secured thereby. (In otherwords the Note that the DOT refers to)



In paperwork from a Debt Collector for Freddie Mac, They say that Freddie Mac (Hereafter FM) owns the mortgage. I called the guy and he admitted that FM made the initial investment in the mortgage. I sent them an Offer of performance and Debt Collector Disclosure Statement, and a CPN.



No response from them...

Reply With Quote