|
Have to disagree Charles. It is hard enough being a "man" nowadays. Don't want my kids snatched away either. I'd hate to have my pay go down, and my "child" support go up, simply because of my gender.
When all that money may very well be going to support a drug habit with no accountability whatsoever.
When someone willfully chooses to be both "parents", they should act that way and support their child financially 100%.
You are so "independent" as a politically correct when you willfully chose to be a "stay at home mom" ??
Then show the world just how independent you really are. Support your kids at the rate of 100%. After all it was "gimme gimme gimme" when it came time to custody.
A bunch of liberal songs about how independent you are only cuts it for the weak.
Most of the time, there is this permanently painted picture in the minds of many whereas it is men who can't keep it in their pockets, and decide to cheat on their partner.
This is far from the truth, believe me. There are PLENTY of women out there who DELIBERATELY deceive men into believing that they are their "soulmate". Once they become pregnant, it is "see you later Charlie.'
Many women already know that it is economically advantageous to get that divorce by claiming that their man cheated or was a woman beater etc.
That situation is already BAD now. I cannot imagine how much worse things would get under Hillary.
Women this, women that. We are all gods creatures, so I WILL NEVER EVER believe that a woman is superior to me in any way, or that I am inferior to a woman in any way.
At least this president didn't fund VAWA.
I have a great amount of respect for you Charles. This is just my opinion, and not a stab at you. Just very concerned about a liberal getting power. I'd take the "right" any day.
|