[Sharing Lights]

FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups Profile You have no new messages Log out [ sharinglights ]


Open Dictatorship Cemented by Defiance of Common Sense
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Quatloos! Forum Index -> Ranting & Raving and Political Issues
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
sharinglights
Pirate o' Non-Pithy Prolix Parlance


Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 176

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:02 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nikki wrote:
Flush!

SL: So true - true toilet can only flash - trully....

_________________
Sacred Triangle: Believe/Learn/Accomplish.
Foundation: Cement the above by Virtues.
Finding the true Center is the Key!
In order to preserve fairness & accuracy,
my writing(s) may be re-posted unedited
& in context only.

Back to top


scooterdog223
Cannoneer



Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 87

Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:02 pm Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

sharinglights wrote:
scooterdog223 wrote:
sharinglights wrote:
scooterdog223 wrote:
SL:
NO, nobody is "harassing me", or even telling me what I can and can't post. Nobody's pm'd me with special instructions. Not that it would matter, I would post what I post anyway, until I get the ban put on me. And I don't see that happening, it appears that they just delete your post's if they don't like it. I would rather they do that, over ganging up on me and puting the "ban" on, like that rat infested sh*t hole called Sui J-one.

I was just posting wondering why my name was brought up when I haven't responded to the thread. That was all I was saying.

I did explain why.

Explained what?

I 'll repost then:

Code:

Even though, you did write not such nice things of me in the beginning, but I must admit, you wrote no such things of this captain.

These folks are used to bullying their way through.

In me they met calm, precise, and logical opposition (of course they would deny that too.)


Since they are not used to dealing with such and don't know how to suppress me, using intelligence (that some challenge - try to use what don't have) they resort to:

1. pathetic cries of blocking me and,
2. yes, their nervous system, being overstressed, produces such results of paranoia as you have read.

This captain imagines, now, that enemies are everywhere.


The bottom line is this:

I opposed him - not you.
So, don't worry about it and don't search non-existent evidence.


The guy is losing it.

First this, next - bladder control.

It does happen when one defames and uses deceit.
The negative energy backfires sooner or later.




If deleting your posts is not harassment, then, it is a gesture of benevolence?

No, its keeping the board clean. I'm not upset over anything of mine being deleted.

Code:
Oh, common, now.
That is an outright Policing action with invasion into IP.
On top of that, all biased and arbitrarily.

No its not. Why do you feel the need to make post after post to people who could care less? Nobody but you and DM see things your way here, right or wrong, they dont and never will.
How has anyone "invaded my IP?"???? Only sucky site one and two do that, for all the good it does them. Sharinglights, nobody, not one person, has threatened me here. Sure, a few pukes tried to have me voted outa here, but that didn't work. I have no complaints.

I do not recall posts being deleted at Sui Juris.

Mine were deleted because of that peace of crap Ice. Burn in hell ice. Who is now banned, but mine was never lifted.

Code:
Again, provide prima facie what exactly did you write before were banned?

I say that banning must be absolutely the last resort.
I wish you and Ice were not banned.


But, SD, using wishes like "in hell" that's a bit far.

Look how much crap has been thrown at me here.

However, I do not wish any one to "burn in hell."

I only wish them to see their wrong and make the best - not the worst of it.

Any time, (if and when) they act decently, I would not dwell on the past.

Sounds like you have tough time forgiving.

You must protect you Rights but also be able to look at misfortunes with a smile as your inner energy would move you forward while deep hate is an external feeling crawling deeply inside of you and displacing real you.

A part of that person you hate makes a home in you and, then, you begin acting like him or her.

Ex. every bully was bullied by some one before...
Many cops are on a quest to get even when were hurt in childhood.

Wtf? How am I supposed to remember what was deleted over a year ago?? I don't have the info with me, but it can be proven. Each web site is recorded by at least five others, you do a trace route and can pull up pages the day before they were deleted. This is proof. I can't do it now, but if your that damn worried about it, I can prove it when I get home.

Now, let's be honest.
Were you not considerably rude to numbers of members at Sui Juris?

Yes, because they are stupid. I do regret picking on the mentally retarded people, but the majority of them are just A-H's.

Code:
Disagree.
There many people of substance and Independence who try their best to stand for their Rights and they do more and more.

SD, I am one of the most active there, so I speak from what read personally.

Plus, I observe very quickly.

You picked on me here behind my back, unmanly, when wrote things you wrote.
You did.
Therefore, I have no evidence that you would not do or did so vs. others in similar situations on Sui Juris.

SD, you weer wrong in your defamation vs. me as I even work weekends at times.
I am far from being lazy.
SD please reflect on your ways impartially.

I said "maybe", there is a difference. You went overboard with the "nikki and scooterdog" posts at that **** hole site, way out of line there.

Further ;more, you want to "claim" I defamed you, well.... the burdon of proof is on you, not me. I will retract what I said if you 'prove" I was making a false statement. I until this time comes, will stand by what I post.

Or you claim "out of the blue" by ELO?
Great album by the way.

I noticed the following:

When you were rude to Nikky, not only your post disappeared - the whole Thread was blocked.

Probably, not saying this is it, but I'm guesing, because the responses were a waste of space. It did seem a little one sided, but I'm not upset over it.

Code:
Did they brainwash you?

WHAT!!?? :evil: ARE YOU trying to piss me off? I don't give a **** about nikki, or what I said to her, or what she said to me. It was deleted, and unlike some people, I don't intend to dwell on it for the next 5 years. WHO CARES?

When crap is piled by some - that's not waste of space but when..... no need to elaborate - too self-evident.

Let' not get hypocritical now.

Look, I do not have any malice toward Quatloos.
I, still, maintain that there are decent people everywhere.

I simply address each individually against whom I have evidence of "dirty" conduct.
That's all.

I provide proof for all to see or ask them provide such.
I quote and add reason.

When, the same members still continue digging in with their spite, malice and defamation, I add artistic mode too.

But the evidence of all sides is in the open.


Why do you, an some others, instead of evidence, provide only one sided allegations without truly disclosing what did and how?
Scooterdog223, as frank as I am, I have "pissed off" a few folks at Sui Juris, even told exactly what I think of one Moderator but about 90& of all interactions have been very positive.

Let's face it, about 90% of all interactions here (I testify to that) have been the reverse.

Provide prima facie or you bash Sui Juris being upset that lost membership.

Believe me, I am not disrespectful to you - let's be honest about the core of the matter - not less.

Oh now: http://www.suijuris.net/forum/court/...tml#post108888

Code:
The key word was -"let's be honest"
So let's be!

If you refer to my answer at that Thread after I was defamed behind my back here, then, lets' get it straight.


After I read Nikky's and your pearls via a Search Engine (that is how I found out) I did not put an image of a cow on scooter
OUT OF THE BLUE.

I was defamed and I responded, accordingly
You should have known that attacking me
and "vulnerability" are just not compatible.

I retaliate semi-hard but fairly and only, once begin adding artistic replies with logical get in the mode: lion to hyena's throat when do not release until finish.

While many people from all over would be laughing at the perpetrators for a while, that would not be funny to the original party.
I do not know why you forgot that.
Didn't you see what Henry Bowman and B Rookard "won" and lost each time they jumped.

Practically all in Sui Juris began looking at them as they deserve after they exposed themselves.
But did I ever insult one of them or anyone first?
Be honest now.

I give you my word, had I not been defamed, I would have never responded to you and Nikky unprovoked or to any one.

To feel terrible guilt knowing that I hurt an innocent party is too much for me.


With respect,