[nydeemarie]

I sent the Judges order back, refusal for cause.. and filed a Notice to the Court about his recusal from my case..

The Notice raised.. jurisdiction, challenging the judge's authority to adjudicate, due process, failure to state a claim and void order issues as sufficient cause to refuse..

I was informed that serving the above notice on the receiver (appointed by the alleged order) still may not be enough to stop him?

I am confused.. as he is an officer of the court, was served the above and is noticed of the controversy. As an officer of the court is there an expectation implied.. Surely he should know about trespass and fraud upon the court.

I am not sure how a receiver must operate.. Is there a better way to Notice them?

Would a lease agreement with a tenant have a superior interest, and would it be something that a reciever upon notice would find difficult to deal with?

Would noticing my mortgage holder about the controversy, void order, possible trespass be effective..?

Opinions, thoughts, ideas? TIA..