I read the whole thing and still do not know what you mean by "40800" -
however by "will work on appeal" I gather you were convicted in the trial court a month ago by the transcriber date. Did he give you driving class? I suppose he did and you are not going to bother appealing. So would you show us the "40800" argument too? [Or describe what the 40800 issue is and post only those page images.]
I know that feeling to hold yourself in coherent esteem with the attorneys in black robes. My experience is it is a bit empty - it is his job to hear you anyway. If he fails to hear you out, then you have an appeal issue!
Attached is an example of what I was talking about with Surname and that angle of the argument.
Get a look at how they specify Line 1 to be "Name" but the Explanatory Notes on Page 5 specify "Surname". Since my name is my given name I insisted on the truth. At least on the document I was signing. I would be saying my name is our surname if I allowed them to manipulate that with the application, like they tried to do.
However if they would have been straightforward enough to specify "Surname" then I would have put in our surname. No problem if somebody else constructs a legal name around me. It is not until I do it that it matters.
Look carefully:
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...Definition.jpg
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...Name_legal.jpg
See that "name" is in quotation marks? That means it is something other than name - something foreign to English. They are saying name is legal name - and both definitions are when you put the given or Christian name and the family or surname together.
If I would not have been careful, people identifying me by that passport would call me by my family's name as though it was my name.
Regards,
David Merrill.