[mrg]

Originally Posted by Notorial dissent

The IRS is a bureau within the Department of the Treasury which is an office of the Executive Branch of the government of the United States of America.

Diversified Metal Products, Inc., Plaintiff, v. T-Bow Company Trust,
Internal Revenue Service, and Steve Morgan.
Case No. CV 93-4117, Complaint for Impleader.

In the District court of the Seventh Judicial District of The State of Idaho, In And For The County Of Bonneville Magistrates Court.

In the Complaint for Impleader, prepared by the attorneys for plaintiff, page one, item #4:

Defendant Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is an agency of the United States government which has presented to Plaintiff a lien against monies to which Defendant Steve Morgan, or presumably Defendant T-Bow Company Trust for him, may be entitled.

The response of the Attorneys for the United States of America, prepared by Betty Richardson, United States Attorney, Box 32, Boise, Idaho 83707. Civil No. 93-405-E-EJL, United States' Answer and Claim re: Diversified Metal Products, Inc., Plaintiff v. T-Bow Company Trust, Internal Revenue Service and Steve Morgan, Defendants, page 4, item #4:

Denies (the U.S. government) that the Internal Revenue Service is an agency of the United States government

Is there some difference between an "agency of the United States government," and "bureau within the Department of the Treasury which is an office of the Executive Branch of the government of the United States of America," in which such "bureau" which, admittedly (by respondent UNITED STATES), on record, "is not an agency of the United States government," can, in a bureaucratic capacity of "not an agency of the United States government" operate "within the Department of the Treasury which is an office of the Executive Branch of the government of the United States of America," in a capacity without "agency of the United States government?"

How, precisely, and by what specific and precise mechanics, does this particular "bureau" which admittedly (by respondent UNITED STATES), on record, "is not an agency of the United States government," operate as
"a bureau within the Department of the Treasury which is an office of the Executive Branch of the government of the United States of America?"

In what precise relationship to "the Department of the Treasury which is an office of the Executive Branch of the government of the United States of America," would the so called "bureau" (IRS?, alleged Bureau of Internal Revenue? or ?), which the Department of Justice ("which is an office of the Executive Branch of the government of the United States of America?"), "Denies that the Internal Revenue Service is an agency of the United States," would such "bureau" ("not an agency of the United States government"), be situated, or employed?

Where is the precise documentation of the exact nature of such relationship?

Is it a "bureau?"

It calls itself a "service," does it not?

Is it a contractual relationship?

Is the IRS an independent contractor?

Is the IRS, in any part, a collection agency subject to FDCPA?

I find legislation concerning an "office of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue," "created in the Treasury Department," within "The Revenue Act of 1862 (July 1, 1862, Ch. 119, 12 Stat. 432)."

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage...db&recNum=0463
(It goes on for a few pages, just keep clicking "Next Image.")

But I find nowhere within The Revenue Act of 1862 (July 1, 1862, Ch. 119, 12 Stat. 432) provision for creating a "Bureau of Internal Revenue."

I have heard rumors of allegations at the time of The Revenue Act of 1862 (July 1, 1862, Ch. 119, 12 Stat. 432), concerning a "Bureau of Internal Revenue," and allegations of Congressional "intent" to create such, allegedly published by the "Commissioner of Internal Revenue," in the Federal Register.

Where, though, is the precise legislation which precisely created that precisely named "bureau?"

Perhaps Betty Richardson, United States Attorney, Box 32, Boise, Idaho 83707 might actually know the truth?