Your last post indicates you possess, at least, a tenuous comprehension of the concepts offered as assistance to you in my post. However, I sense you do not, quite yet, grasp those offered by Shoonra.
Additionally, you seem to completely miss the more important point. The purpose of communication, written or oral, is to impart to others, in a comprehensible form, the information which you would wish them to understand; especially if, as in this case, you would like assistance with a problem.
It should be apparent to you only Codee was willing to take the time to decipher the mish-mash of strung together, dependent and independent clauses. The information you provided was in part incomplete, irrelevant, immaterial and illogical; to elucidate just some of the deficiencies.
My comments on your presentation have nothing to do with etiquette, protocol or sensibilities. They were used to determine, in a response from you, whether you have, in my opinion, the requisite intellect necessary to represent yourself in court. You mixed together, at various points, a number of possible approaches to a defense, including both potential civil, criminal and unknown, to me, attacks. But you presented nothing of substance supporting the idea you have any idea about which you are talking.
To date you still have not, I believe, provided Codee with answers to all his questions; nor have you made any attempt to present any other information in a more comprehensible form. Perhaps you should seek professional assistance elsewhere.
Joseph Sugarman,
design@dream-home.com