|
I certainly appreciate all the support. I will take ND's negativity as school of hard knocks pessimism and file it where appropriate.
I gained all the insight to the revenue extortion racket perpetuated by the State from study and review of this forum. If nothing else, I am grateful that I am no longer intimidated by them. I see them for what they really are. Children with power. I addressed every angle I could with assertiveness and let them know that I will not be an easy target.
However, based upon ND's comment, why was I given the choice to dismiss based upon their error in paperwork or waive that error and continue with the trial? It would seem a no-brainer to be done with it no matter the circumstance. I am curious however, that my 'motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted' was denied. Afterall, the Judge stated this claim had no remedy.
Logically, if the officer was operating in a vacant capacity and the court had no subject matter to dispute and no competent fact witness or unbiased testimony, then how come I was only able to get their attention due to an error in paperwork?
BTW, I could not have gotten into any real trouble as ND warned. This is a misdemeanor with a small fine. I have nothing to lose and everything to gain by fighting their open fraud of extortion by force.
I focused my attention on the details surrounding the foundation of the claim and addressed the judge specifically on points I am sure he does not hear often.
Ultimately, I wanted the judge working for me and against the prosecution. He did not heed my affidavit of corporate denial however and was initially the person who plead for me at arraignment, so I do not know why he openly violated his Oath of Office, and I do not know at this point on how to procedurally prohibit him from doing that, so I was alittle surprised when he began asking the prosecution for a notarized complaint and I knew that it was over when the prosecutor answered "no".
Most of the rest of the time, I stay out of court. I usually submit paperwork that causes the DA to drop the case before trial, so I am a little inexperienced with the open disregard for the rule of law while in the courtroom, but I think I have gained valuable experience and I will be ready if they refile this claim. Who cares if I lose, it is only Federal Reserve Notes which are worth less every day and the reactions by the courtroom full of peasant slaves in response to my challenges are priceless!
Logan
__________________
GOVERNMENT WARNING:
-GOVERNMENTS ARE EXTREMELY DANGEROUS!
DEATH, IMPRISONMENT, THEFT OF PROPERTY,
AND LOSS OF FREEDOM WILL RESULT FROM
GIVING THEM TOO MUCH POWER.
-When an honestly ignorant man learns the truth, he either ceases to be ignorant or he ceases to be honest!
"Why is there a red laser dot on my chest?"
What would Jesus do concerning the events of 911? Kill 1,118,000 innocent and unassociated people? Ignorance or Apathy: which one are you?
|