[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by trav12433

Hmmmm so Peter doing something or other while Jesus was something or other...

Relates to expired tags how? I am sorry but I am at a total loss as to how you two (David and Rotwieler) are in anyway helping the actual intended topic of this thread.

Is either of you two actually suggesting that Paul or Jesus can be used in any remedy? Or is this you two talking about your own thing in a thread about expired tags?

I have been trying to relate the two and have missed it.

Thank you Traveler;


You are telling me that Father Giles of Ham is Rottweiler? It that true Father?

A brief look at Bbreitsma shows somebody who got interested enough to read and register for a few posts in February and then remembered Suijuris.net when he got angry about expired tags. My initial advice was, if you look closely, pay it off and move on with his life. Or if he is really serious about fighting and teaching The System a lesson, do it right. - Attack an Achilles' Heel of the jury process in America; where there is an illusion of separation of church and state at the same breath as a unity under Noachide Law.

Bbreitsma may or may not be back.

Father Giles of Ham (Rottweiler?) says:

Sounds possible. I can believe it. This sacrifice substituted the resultant defunctive temple sacrifice...

So Father Giles of Ham is disqualified from any jury because he believes contrary to the faith of the court. However that needs to be pointed out on the record. And the attorney in the black robe might think for a moment about church last Sunday... "Well, I am in control and we cannot disqualify jurors for believing in the Resurrection, especially since I believe it too."

But getting it on the Record prepares the battlefield for an attack in the appeals court. Where things like I quoted proving that American courts are not in fact Christian, they are Babylonian Jewish in origin. The images I added to a post above are from the Babylonian Talmud and they elucidate the character and nature of the cause against Bbreitsma, in fact everybody.

Since I know this I simply abate any nuisance before it gets to trial or even arraignment. So I do not get the pleasure to try it out and watch how it flies. But Bbreitsma came here looking for suggestions and I think it would be interesting and even productive to watch things.

Originally Posted by Trav12433

You need to ignore people that will talk of nothing on your object.

Your confusion about how these things tie together is disingenuous. You are simply defending blind faith in Jesus Christ as if he were God. Maybe so. I have a different interpretation of the Bible.

It is just that being dishonest in any foundation is like building a house on sand instead of bedrock. As I see it, you are simply trying to make it look like I am leading the thread far afield.

Rottweiler disguising himself as Father Giles of Ham is the same kind of deception. Until he confirms or denies that I am not prepared to believe it because the writing styles are distinct. This kind of subterfuge in conversation, while often productive, really goes to show why people who accept the supernatural, the Resurrection cannot possibly be courts of competent jurisdiction. - Not even enough to serve on juries, or even know their own names for that matter.

UGA Lawdog was ranting about overturning convictions in an attempt to ridicule this kind of jurisprudence. But that is only to make me appear irrational about it. What I was saying is get that kind of an objection on the record and watch what happens. However, I think that Bbreitsma has forgotten about Suijuris.com and may not be coming back to even read what he started.

The interest level may easily be gauged by the Views ticker - both here and on Quatloos alike.

BTW- interesting comment about the wherabouts of Peter.

Mainly the objective is to point out the subjectivity of Bible interpretation. And therefore show the usefulness of undermining the belief sets of a majority of any jury - even the court itself misdirected into thinking it is a Christian court when it is in fact administration of the Seven Noachide Laws.


Regards,

David Merrill.