|
Originally Posted by DCLXVI
You state that when I apply for registration I am applying to classify my car as a motor vehicle. Yes? No? Yes, among other things, a listing for taxation.
You also state that it is presumed/assumed that I am to know that this classification is part of the application and that the application process itself is responsible for the classification. Yes? No?No, the application is an application, it makes no presumptions as to the terms of the offer, it leaves that for you to determine. If you're dumb enough to sign up, they just take your money.
I ask you for the wording in the application that makes you think so and you do not give me any wording from an application. Yes? No? Yes, there is no wording in the application. It is not up to the DMV to determine whether your vehicle is a motor vehicle or not, that is up to you to decide. When you are ready they will gladly take your money.
I ask you now for either:
1) The wording in a state application for registration that creates a presumption/assumption in law that my vehicle is now to be classified as a "motor vehicle".
There is no such wording and there need not be, as it is the actions of the applicant that caused the re-classification, to be listed in their taxing database of motor vehicles.
or
2) The wording in a statute, code, rule, or regulation, that suggests that a presumption/assumption is created by my application for registration of a motor vehicle.
Again, you will find no such wording. As mentioned in my previous post, the parameters of a motor vehicle are spelled out in the statutes and it is the applicants responsibility to determine whether his vehicle falls within the classification. Use is a determining factor, but the statutes are clear. Motor vehicles must be registered, but they are also clear in that registration must be applied for, a voluntary act. If one applies to have his vehicle registered as a motor vehicle the intent seems pretty clear. The Statutes don't necessarily have to presume anything, the sheeple can do that themselves.
Further I would like to know your strategy on tackling the obvious problem with the laws/codes/statutes that require registration of "motor vehicles". If the registration application is what makes a "vehicle" a "motor vehicle" then how does one ever apply rightfully for registration. The legislature is not presumed to create laws with no effect. By stating that registration is needed before application for registration is made, is to create a paradox/impossibility in law and as such that construction must be avoided at nearly all costs.I don't have a clue what your talkin about here, you're gonna have to splain this again.
|