[palani]

Originally Posted by goffertrap

Is that really what I said? Or is that what you WISH I had said. I never said "fit" did I?

I don't know what this 8 trillion dollar debt of your's has to do with the price of rice in china, but whatever.

I guess I don't understand what you are babbling about Palani, sorry. If someone want's to point out a court in the United States of America, in the year 2007, that you can go in and use all this "Common Law" of yours, please, again, show me where it is. I have found no such place on a map, in a book, or on the net. I suspect, if you do find a court house that this happens in, yes, they would probably be inbred, backwardsass hillbilly's, who clearly are not up on the time. Heck, they probably wouldn't know what a flashlight was if you showed them, but they may burn you at the stake for possesing "witch craft like power's" which allows you to use evil energy to shine light out of a stick.

Might be easier for you to show me a court in the land that does not use common law. A fool might mistake reason for argument.

Why the hang-up on hillbillies?

I know the following quote from Blackstone has some big words and complicated sentences but if you find a cooperative 12 year old to explain it to you then you might gain some understanding of the current situation.

BUT this intricacy of our legal process will be found, when attentively considered, to be one of those troublesome, but not dangerous, evils which have their root in the frame of our conftitution, and which therefore can never be cured, without hazarding every thing that is dear to us. In absolute governments, when new arrangements of property and a gradual change of manners have destroyed the original ideas, on which the laws were devised and establifhed, the prince by his edict may promulge a new code, more suited to the present emergencies. But when laws are to be framed by popular assemblies, even of the reprefentative kind, it is too Herculean a task to begin the work of legislation afresh, and extract a new system from the discordant opinions of more than five hundred counsellors. A single legisator or an enterprising sovereign, a Solon or Lycurgus, a Juftinian or a Frederick, may at any time form a concise, and perhaps an uniform, plan of justice; and evil betide that presumptuous fubject who queftions it's wisdom or utility. But who, that is acquainted with the difficulty of new-modelling any branch of our statute laws (though relating but to roads or to parish-settlements) will conceive it ever feasible to alter any fundamental point of the common law, with all it's appendages and consequents, and set up another rule in it's stead ? When therefore, by the gradual influence of foreign trade and domestic tranquillity, the spirit of our military tenures began to decay, and at length the whole structure was removed, the judges quickly perceived that the forms and delays of the old feodal actions, (guarded with their several outworks of effoins, vouchers, aid-prayers, and a hundred other formidable intrenchments) were ill suited to that more simple and commercial mode of property which succeeded the former and required a more speedy decision of right, to facilitate exchange and alienation. Yet they wisely avoided soliciting any great legislative revolution in the old establifhed forms, which might have been productive of conveyances more numerous and extensive than the most penetrating genius could forfee; but left them as they were, to languish in obscurity and oblivion, and endeavoured by a series of minute contrivances to accommodate such personal actions, as were then in use, to all the most useful purposes of remedial justice: and where, through the dread of innovation, they hesitated at going so far as perhaps their good sense would have prompted them, they left an opening for the more liberal and enterprising judges, who have fate in our courts of equity, to shew them their error by supplying the omissions of the courts of law. And, since the new expedients have been refined by the practice of more than a century, and are sufficiently known and understood, they in general answer the purpose of doing speedy and substantial justice, much better than could now be effected by any great fundamental alterations. The only difficulty that attends them arises from their fictions and circuities, but, when once we have discovered the proper clew, that labyrinth is easily pervaded. We inherit an old Gothic castle, erected in the days of chivalry, but fitted up for a modern inhabitant. The moated ramparts, the embattled towers, and the trophied halls, are magnificent and venerable, but useless. The inferior apartments, now converted into rooms of conveyance, are cheerful and commodious, thought their approaches are winding and difficult.