Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DCLXVI
Please show me the precise phrase that uses the term "accept". If that word is not used then it is not unambiguous as to the term "Make" meaning "accept". If the state "accepts" payment then it is the payor that decided to use those goods as payment and it was he that made the goods into "money".
|
What you have stated has already addressed by another, which I will comment on. People need to stop agreeing FRNs are money, because they are not. What part of Federal Reserve Notes are obligations (debt) do you not understand? It is by people's acceptance that FRNs are money is the reason it is taxed. It cannot be otherwise. Debts cannot be taxed. Where is the accession to wealth that the PTB and their agents claim with FRNs? There is none because evidence of debt can never be gain or increasing one's wealth. This is bogus BS!!!
One of the meanings of "make" is "cause to be." The fact is "make" does not mean create. Remember, there is already a prohibition against coining money, so make cannot mean create. Therefore this is referring to acceptance. No state shall make (cause to be) any Thing but gold or silver Coin a Tender in Payment of debts. The states are prohibited from accepting any Thing but gold or silver Coin as a Tender in Payment and since there is no "money" any longer with which to do so, then FRNs can only discharge. If there is only discharge with FRNs (evidence of debt), then there can be no violation of the Constitution.
It is not a matter of whether I am right or wrong, but what the Law of the Land says. My explanation above is correct.