[cdsea10]

can't get a newspaper to publish...
Letter to the Editor:

Will Governor Tim Kaine, David Albo (the sponsor of the law) and the members of the legislature recognize their criminal act upon We the People of Virginia is a Constitutional issue?

They failed in their fiduciary duty, violated their Va. Code 49.1 recorded oath of office to ‘support the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of Virginia’ and have placed their security bonds in jeopardy. Their criminal act is the traffic ‘civil remedial fees’ attached to the transportation bill just passed... a violation under the color of law of the unalienable rights and constitutional protections of We the People of Virginia. There is no escape for them. The probable cause evidence is their “yea” on the passed legislation.


The ‘civil remedial fees’ violates the 13th amendment. The Supreme Court, Bailey v. Alabama, 219 U.S. 219, at page 243, stated: “The act of Congress, nullifying all state laws by which ... to enforce the ‘service or labor of any persons as peons,... necessarily embraces all legislation which seeks to compel the service or labor by making it a crime to refuse or fail to perform it. Such laws would furnish the readiest means of compulsion.” The act of Congress is codified presently in 42 U.S.C. § 1994, Peonage abolished, and 18 U.S.C. § 1581, Peonage; obstructing enforcement; formerly Revised Statutes §§ 1990 and 5526. (See also Clyatt vs US., 197 us 207 (1904) and United States vs Kozminski, 487 us 931 (1988))

The peonage in the “civil remedial fees” is using force for involuntary servitude to compel the specific performance of labor for highway construction in Virginia.

BEWARE OF THE FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE... every State, county or city personal who has an oath and bond.... State troopers, county and city police and judges will be violating their oath and placing their bonds in jeopardy by this unconstitutional legislation. Though legislators (lawyers), they shall not violate the Constitution of the united States of America, the Constitution of Virginia nor their oath while thumbing their noses and saying “Who’s watching?” to We the People of Virginia.

The Supreme Court says different in the following:

“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”
Marbury v Madison, 5 US 137,176

“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.”
Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)


“There is no question of the general doctrine that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments.”
U.S. vs. Throckmorton 98, US 61,65 (1878)

"The claim and exercise of a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT cannot be converted into a crime" Miller v. U.S, 230 F. 486, 489

The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision...
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it. Sixteenth American Jurisprudence

No Virginian need agree to conditions that are prohibited by law of the United States of America.

This is the tip of the iceberg in the discussion however not in the extent of the laws violated... 42 United States Code §1983, 18 USC §1018, 18 USC §241, 18 USC §872, and probably more.