|
"Cuneiform scholars have identified the date on this tablet as equivalent to September, 11, 3 BC."
The above is very intersting. First it stipulates that the identification was made by "Cuneiform scholars", not necessarilly experts in archaeology or in the pseudoscience of 'carbon dating'. Irony exists within the given date, as a possible connection between that date and the date of 9/11/01. People have been known to be swayed by personal agendas of others without having the benefit of conclusive proof of anything.
Just because these people are 'speculating' on an "equivalent" date, does not necessarilly add any degree of importance to that date of 3 BC or of any correlation to that date and 9/11/01.
Just my personal opinion.
Jerry
|