View Single Post
  #8  
Old 09-20-2007, 06:30 AM
robhalford88's Avatar
robhalford88 robhalford88 is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 451
Quote:
Originally Posted by PANICPASS
What does Australia's Constitution say about penalties? The United States Constitution has a prohibition against imposing pains and penalties without first consulting a jury for authority. Article 1 section 9 is titled "Limitations on powers granted to the United States. Article 1 section 9 clause 3 reads, No Bill of Attainder... shall be passed". A Bill of Attainder is 1) an act of a legislative body, 2) naming a described individual or group of people or entities, 3) imposing pain or penalty, 4) without first consulting a jury.

Why does your government behave as though Acts of a Legislature are constitutional when bills of attainder are outlawed? In other words they cannot pass a law authorizing a pain or penalty without first consulting a jury. Did a jury authorize the legislature to pass an Act imposing a penalty on you (the individual) for not paying taxes?
You can set a penalty by agreement, or contract. The notarial protest is a form of agreement.
__________________
RIP Vajo Jnr.
Valentine A.J. Olszak Jr. (1944 - 2007)

RIP Yankee Jim
James Leshkevich 1955-2008
Reply With Quote