There are several components essential to finding remedy from what seems like an oppressive Income Tax system brought to America by central banking – the Federal Reserve System – and its
elastic currency. In its simplicity remedy is guaranteed us in the Judiciary Act; when Congress formed America’s judiciary in 1789:
Quote:
|
"...the United States, ... within their respective districts, as well as upon the high seas; (a) saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it; and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all seizures on land,..." The First Judiciary Act; September 24, 1789; Chapter 20, page 77. The Constitution of the United States of America, Revised and Annotated - Analysis and Interpretation - 1982; Article III, §2, Cl. 1 Diversity of Citizenship, U.S. Government Printing Office document 99-16, p. 741.
|
Without a fundamental understanding of the common law and how to perform process competently, remedy eludes many and this creates an illusion that government is corrupt – symptomatic paranoia. All the while, approaching the perfection of remedy properly reveals that an equity system of contract agreement is at the root of things. And contracts are voluntary.
I appreciate GIM for showing an article that struck home with me as an important
stepping stone about lawful money:
http://goldismoney.info/forums/t1850...ury-notes.html
And I mean
stepping stone in a more literal sense because of the date – 1984. The Treasury decided to stop issuing US Notes because Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) functioned in every way for US Notes, in 1971. So US Notes are now rare to find in that form. However they are wherever you imagine them because they are essential to finding remedy. Congress defines US Notes to still be in circulation and to be lawful money. While Congress defines FRNs to only be redeemable in lawful money. So according to Congress and by the Constition that power to define money US Notes are still available today – just in the form of FRNs. The 1984 article is a good stepping stone to understanding this because apparently in 1984, there were still enough US Notes floating about in circulation to give the author the impression they still circulated in the original form. Whereas today, if you redeem your FRNs at any bank, you will just get change in more FRNs and that is essentially the only form of US Notes today.
It is also fundamental to understand that all debt arises out of admiralty jurisdiction. This is fundamental to debt itself because of credit. Credit is awaiting claim and that is the fundamental definition of insurance and all insurance arises from an ancient bonding of gold shipped by sea called bottomry. An island off the coast of France named Oleron formed a record of shipping cases (
stare decisis = case law) and upon the return from the Crusades, Richard Lionheart and his mother Eleanor of Aquitaine needed to adopt a body of law to justify the influx of wealth from Israel. Jettison, floatsam and forfeiture all fit the bill. All one had to pretend was that all this stuff was just lying around and in thirty days, if nobody had come forward with a Verified Statement of Right and Interest, it was now owned by the founder party by quiet title…
Here’s a great example of presumed forfeiture:
http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images...s/Warrant1.gif
http://www.ecclesia.org/forum/images...s/Warrant2.gif
See how that works? Simply grab it and pretend you did not steal it. But publish a notice that you have found it and if nobody claims it, it is yours. If somebody does claim it, find out how much tax is owed by that party, deduct it, and return what is left over.
A very enlightening case from 1815 explains all this in detail:
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...vio_v_Boit.zip
Therefore I will simply open by attaching remedy in its modern form as perfected by some 250 Americans that I am aware of. One should be aware that a perspective is essential; which is that due to the evolution of
Supplemental Rules of Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims in the US district courts, one only enters the admiralty briefly and in a
restricted appearance – to get out into competent common law. As you might gather – because of abuse of jettison, floatsam and forfeiture concepts, like in the warrant linked it is plain to you and I, that admiralty is not a competent forum for one to perfect remedy.
In subsequent posts, I intend to field questions and fully explain the many components to making remedy function to protect property rights in America today.
Regards,
David Merrill.