View Single Post
  #8  
Old 10-23-2007, 06:02 PM
rottweiler's Avatar
rottweiler rottweiler is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: judicial district of tens: Milwaukee the county: Wisconsin the land
Posts: 2,614
Quote:
Originally Posted by weishaupt1776
norwester, post your questions here

no pm's

I don't have a question but I have a opinion. I know, I know, opinions are like ........, but my opinion is based on good old common sense and cases.

If a man/woman cancels the Federal Reserve Account they have sovereign immunity from the IRS and all the rest of the federal union garbage. This is what is described by the mythical term "sovereign without subjects".

However, when a person with a Federal Reserve Account breaks chain of command and marches straight into a blackmarket court the IRS has sovereign immunity.

There is a "savings to suitors" for the latter where administrative remedies must be applied before the sovereignty will be waived.

Basically what I am saying is John Jennings in 1998 didn't know what we know now. What he is talking about won't work.
__________________
United States never held any municipal sovereignty, jurisdiction, or right of soil in Alabama or any of the new states which were formed ... The United States has no Constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty or eminent domain, within the limits of a state or elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted ...
[Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S. 212 (1845)]
Reply With Quote