[heyday]

Following will be presented a detailed look at the flawed logic of the Oklahoma Court of Appeals regarding the requirement of a license to excercize the right to travel.

Links to all cases cited:

HUMPHREYS v. STATE


ROBERTSON v. STATE EX REL. LESTER

BAILEY v. CITY OF TULSA

BRANTLEY v. STATE

Oklahoma v Moyers

COLLINS-DIETZ-MORRIS CO. v. STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION

Ex parte TINDALL

Ex parte SALES

BARBOUR v. WALKER

FROST v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA 271 U.S. 583 (1926)