[David Merrill]

Originally Posted by Livefire

And no law of Jubilee to set you free either!!!

Deuteronomy 15:1-3

Deu 15:1 At the end4480, 7093 of every seven7651 years8141 thou shalt make6213 a release.8059

Deu 15:2 And this2088 is the manner1697 of the release:8059 Every3605 creditor1167, 4874, 3027 that834 lendeth5383 aught unto his neighbor7453 shall release8058 it; he shall not3808 exact5065 (853) it of his neighbor,7453 or of his brother;251 because3588 it is called7121 the LORD's3068 release.8059

Deu 15:3 Of (853) a foreigner5237 thou mayest exact5065 it again: but that which834 is1961 thine with854 thy brother251 thine hand3027 shall release;8058

H5237
נכרי

nokrîy

nok-ree'

From H5235 (second form); strange, in a variety of degrees and applications (foreign, non-relative, adulterous, different, wonderful): - alien, foreigner, outlandish, strange (-r, woman).

H5235
נכר נכר

neker nôker

neh'-ker, no'-ker

From H5234; something strange, that is, unexpected calamity: - strange.

My paper copy includes "...feign self to be another..."

And therefore the response to the legal identity is essential. To answer PSholz' question, why would Randy Lee's abatement work? My presumption, after many R4C and abatements for misnomer in that style myself, is that Randy Lee had never testified to being the artificial entity on the paperwork the IRS agent left on his door.

I was involved at the time with the Christian Jural Society as they called it. I was the Scribe for the Colorado Jural Society which was spearheaded by several people in constant touch with Randy Lee, and we even had them come out to lecture. That is to say John Joseph SAUNDERS - stage name John Quade (Every Which Way but Loose fame as leader of the Black Widows and brunt end of the monkey flipping the bird...)

Here we should take another look at Rule E(8):

(8) Restricted Appearance.

An appearance to defend against an admiralty and maritime claim with respect to which there has issued process in rem, or process of attachment and garnishment, may be expressly restricted to the defense of such claim, and in that event is not an appearance for the purposes of any other claim with respect to which such process is not available or has not been served.

Conditioning bites us all in the butt the moment we allow one contract to boil over into another - assumpsit. Just because in the scope of one contract agreement, we make a promise to perform, that does not mean that an IRS agent can pull that promise out of that context and into a new context.

The perfect example is Judge Roy Bean - even today, they are infatuated with me on Quatloos:

Originally Posted by Judge Roy Bean

Having access to another computer on another network, I can at least view the sui site without alarms going off.

It's good to know that Van Pelt's gibberish machine is still working:

The mark of a true attorney in a black robe right there. He imposes a legal identity upon me, one that I do not wear myself. It must be terribly frustrating for him how thin that conditioning gets, the more he tries to make it stick - especially over cyberspace.

For instance you might call Randy Lee and don't be surprised if he says, "Good afternoon, in whose name do you come." If you say your name instead of, "In the name of Jesus Christ." - he will probably hang up on you. The IRS agent left the notice/summons on the door because Randy Lee had already removed the house numbers and mailbox from in front of his home. No evidence he was resident in California and domiciled in the District's corporation - the State of California.



Regards,

David Merrill.