View Single Post
  #21  
Old 11-21-2007, 09:02 PM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slavic38
That went right over my head... "write it into the bond agreement"???

My main question was more for a basic term definition.

If "acquiring the "exclusive original cognizance" of the US" meant that any agents/members/principals of the US should automatically be aware of whatever the contents of the jacket are without the need to serve them with the contents personaly/individually? In other words is putting it into the jacket the equivalent of serving each and every agents/members/principals of the US with it, not in the sense of an actual notice where thay are in fact noticed, but that they are, ... say, presumed to be aware of whatever the contents are, or something to that effect?

I, quite sure that in reality they won't be aware, but technically, is that what "acquiring the "exclusive original cognizance" of the US" is supposed to mean?

Thanks again for letting me "pick Your brain".


Examine the clerk instruction attached.

You simply refuse it for cause but copy the instruction to the presenter so they know if they proceed with the cause, you can simply prove the cognizance of the US.


Regards,

David Merrill.
Attached Files
File Type: doc Clerk Instruction formal.doc (1.31 MB, 21 views)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
It is worth noting that the fealty to the Pope, which you cited for its explicit mention of the Templar abbey in Dover, is the legal basis for the invalidation of the Magna Carta after it was sealed at Runnymede.
During discussion about the Treaty of 1213 and the Magna Charta (1215).

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/medieval/magframe.htm
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/john1a.html
Reply With Quote