http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/fdocs/do...submit=showdkt
It looks like the PRA is still of interest and I noted
Salberg was mentioned again. A while back Robert Lawrence created some bad case law by appealing the dismissal of his DoJ prosecution on the erroneous impression it was the PRA issue that scared the DoJ.
View attachments.
To this day I still do not think Lawrence gets it. The justices were not talking about the 1995 PRA even if Lawrence was. The notice associated with the 1040 form in the Instructions is the 1980 PRA; not the 1995 PRA.
Regards,
David Merrill.