Gee... I guess that also explains why it was a part of the informational package of HJR192 (public law 73-10). Hmmmm.
In regards to the former JAG officer who died in the hospital, I guess he was telling too much of the truth, like in the example of Kennedy. Now speaking of Naval officers and their roles in the militaristic take-over of the geography known as North America, let us consider the information that is published in the Army field manuals in regard to treatment of 'civilians' during time when the military is called into 'active' measures within the geography of North America. Shall we go there? It is not yet a part of this thread, but a new thread can be started if need be.
Jerry
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra
I have read that booklet and the mentions of it in the Congressional Record. It was not the expression of Congress, nor even written up at Congressional request. A Congressman got special permission to print up this booklet at public expense because the manuscript had been sent to him by a constituent (this was a favor that was not uncommon many years ago but now very restricted) -- a retired Navy JAG lawyer who had previously written a substantial textbook on military contracts. But at that time this man was in a military nursing home and died a few years after this booklet was published. It represents only his own interpretations, and the Congress did not even know of its content when it allowed this booklet to be printed as a favor.
|