[Jerry Pitts]

Originally Posted by andrewmitch

may i please ask for no arguing and to stay on topic?

In a PM to andrewmitch:

Originally Posted by PM

Andrewmitch.

I do appreciate your concern regarding the subject matter of the thread. It should also be noted that the 'sub-topic' of 'sovereignty' was brought up, casually accepted by most, rebutted by me and thus the ensuing discussion that you relate to as arguing.

I have presented information on the sub-topic that predates the Yick-Wo v Hopkins case (wherein was mentioned 'sovereigns without subjects) by at least a couple of years, in fact, it predates English law by at least a couple of centuries ("a couple" off the top of my head without doing the math). It even pre-dates the KJV of the Holy Scripture. No-one has been able to rebut the evidence that I have brought into the sub-topic and therefore, my evidence stands as truth under this secular law that everyone is relating to within the primary post.

I am posting this PM to the thread, as a means of my final word on the subject. If any of the readers care to continue their use of Gods' title "Potentate" in contrast to what is written in the Holy Scripture, then it becomes a matter between them and God. May God have mercy on their souls.

Jerry