For Madeline's sake, I will reiterate. For as I implied, state is more a state of mind than a territorial designation.
Inventing America; Jefferson's Declaration of Independence by Garry Wills explains it rather eloquently - and in light of the rather lucid interjection by Mrg:
Quote:
Now there are two (see Uncle Bernie's "contribution") third-rate Tory Loyalist private monopoly trade guild BAR Associaton bastard Esquire attorneys operating as third-rate propagandists targeting the site?
As well as a convenient foil to play off of?
|
By calculating Lincoln's Gettysburg Address -
Fourscore and Seven Years Ago... we find the launch point of that meaningful political comment to be 1776, not 1789 and that there were many Crown Esquires signing for both parties on the
Declaration of Independence, rendering it an internal memorandum rather than a contract. A quiet title only to rename the Colonies
States.
Ergo, we find as I pointed out above, that the
Territory of Colorado was simply adopting the Constitution
for the US rather than the Constitution
of the US.
This judiciary act of 1789 forming the districts as well as the judiciary under Article III of the Constitution makes it plain:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Judiciary Act of 1789
"...the United States, ... within their respective districts, as well as upon the high seas; (a) saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it; and shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all seizures on land,..." The First Judiciary Act; September 24, 1789; Chapter 20, page 77. The Constitution of the United States of America, Revised and Annotated - Analysis and Interpretation - 1982; Article III, §2, Cl. 1 Diversity of Citizenship, U.S. Government Printing Office document 99-16, p. 741.
|
And like I also pointed out, not only did Jerome Daly continue living in his home for a decade or two more, the only reprisals possible were his Masonic-like membership to the International Bar Association - the Crown Templar Attorners; but the Credit River jury was a fine example of the original intent of the 'saving to suitors' clause in action.
http://www.creditrivertownship.com/
Thank you Lawdog for showing the crux of the state court allegedly overturning is by the US Constitution and Judiciary Act of 1789 the nullity here. The state legislature had outlawed competent common law a couple years before Daly convened a jury? You want to talk about nullities, Lawdog - there it is in your post.
Sadly the current clerk of the township has turned over the records to the county seat. He was a bit offended when I pointed out that he was malfeasant as the clerk of the township for that.
In and around 1933, all the states followed suit in the foreclosure by Governors' Convention and adopted the rule of
Administrative Act of 1933. The state competency through the county courts was abolished and replaced with a system that would try such things as we see there in the State of Minnesota corporation - to make it look like the state legislature had power to overturn competent common law in a township assize. See the attachment as it occurred in Colorado, at least for the extraterritorial state - State of Colorado anyway.
You are welcome Madeline. Thank you for your PMs however I really wish you would allow others to read them too. Please post openly. I am happy you requested some clarification by opening this thread.
Regards,
David Merrill.