|
Lawdog,
There are some statements you have made in this thread, and there is some case law you have provided with which I agree.
There are some statements you have made in this thread, and there is some case law you have provided with which I disagree. Now I recognize that could be just because you have only been able to post one headnote from a case. That headnote may not have been clearly dispositive of the decision.
Perhaps I will have something to add regarding the above at a later date based on your response to that which follows.
You can settle it all for me with just one other case law cite. Please supply any Supreme Court decision, dealing with one human person, or at most a married couple, who have advanced the theory of the definition of income, defined correctly in a series of cases involving corporations, does not apply to him, her or them; and the finding by the Supreme Court it does.
Thank you for your time and effort.
|