|
read, if you can
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FreeFromContract
Save yourself from embarrassment. Administrative courts are illicit as judicial venues and only a fool such as yourself would rely on such rulings and portray them in the same light as SC rulings.
Prove where the rulings Smith provided concerning income have been overturned and you might have something.
Address, directly, joseph sugarman's point and you might have something.
Until then, you're nothing more than a Lapdog.
|
Many of the court decisions I have cited ARE Supreme Court rulings. Anything with the citation format XXX U.S. XXX is a Supreme Court ruling. Work on those reading skills.
As for the rest, asked and answered.
__________________
We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
|