Quote:
Originally posted by ezrhythm
The artificial entity isn't signing, the human being is and is taking on the presumptive adhesions of the quasi-contract. Hence, the man signing is the one who's rights are being reserved.
|
If one assumes the responsibility of a trust by acting as its trustee, the rights and liabilities are spelled out within the indenture itself. There are no presumptive adhesions as the man presumably knew what he was doing. He cannot claim to to be exercising personal rights when the circumstance clearly indicates otherwise.
I don't doubt that there have been successes by using the words "without prejudice", but I would suggest that that was due to the ignorance of the parties involved.
Quote:
Originally posted by weis
And then you wake up and THEY attach the National ID requirement to the DL
LEMME GUESS, it's the strawman's biometric data that's gonna be on the card, right?
|
Obviously a trust cannot act on its own, but THEY do not put a gun to the man's head and force him to be the trustee, he does so voluntarily, with full knowledge of all liabilities. If the trust indenture requires the man's biometric data he may decline to apply for the trustee position.
gldskr