Quote:
He was able to drive to and from the courthouse on multiple occasions without risking, killing or crippling anyone else. He is no more a risk than a licensed driver. However, according to your logic, if he were to get a license the next day, magically, he becomes much less of a risk to the general public than if he were not licensed.
Right there is the big lie that you and supporters of the police state like to perpetuate; by the act of getting a license it makes you and everyone around you safer. That is PROPAGANDA.. You introduce nothing but speculation and subjective criteria to support your position.
So, if getting a license make one fit to drive, then why are licensed drivers constantly involved in auto accidents with other licensed drivers (occasionally on the same day the license is issued)?
|
Still waiting for a response with substance Bernieeee.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Shoonra
The US Supreme Court has held that the DL requirements are for the purpose of public safety, not for revenue.
|
Tell you what, you provide proof that the public will be safer tomorrow if I were to have a license than they are today with me on the roads without a license and I'll go get one.
Offering statistics of a general nature is not proof. I'm talking about me, not general figures concerning certain manipulated data by those benefiting from the revenue scheme.