View Single Post
  #2  
Old 02-01-2008, 11:19 AM
theghost theghost is offline
Practice Makes Perfect
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJWILSON6200
NOTES of LAW

“ ALL RIGHTS RESERVED “ Speak up! And don’t sign anything without attaching this to your signature!! The Law Enforcement system PRESUMES that YOU are a 14th amendment citizen. THE UCC 1 –207 (1-308) Slams their presumption and now….

The CONSTITUTION is an enforceable contract…..IN YOUR FAVOR! …And the 7th amendment is the kingpin from which it swings! So Demand a 7th amendment JURY to try the FACTS!

Platsky v. CIA 953 F.2d. 25
THE JUDGE IS GURIADIAN of YOUR LIBERTYS!!…If you are forced to go to court tell the judge this, right up front, before ANYTHING else!

Cohen v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821)
That “THE FEDERIALIST PAPERS” [came from the primary objective of THE MAGNA CARTA … to protect the people from summary judgements, that is, you being ripped off…no due process]…are THE EXACT RECORD of the intent of the lawmakers.
[Intent of the lawmaker IS the LAW!]

Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 , 6 S. Ct. 524
The Courts Duty is to Protect You.

United States v. Breyer , 829 F. Supp. 773
The Constitution is to be interpetded in favor of YOU! …Because you are the designated Benificary

Trinsey v. Pagliaro D.C.Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647. "Statements of counsel in brief or in argument are not facts before the court . Statements of counsel, in their briefs or their arguments are not sufficient for a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment.

Police Powers…are SUBJECT to the Constitution!!
9th and 10th Amendments Lock them out! From adding to remove rights! And this means Probable Cause….They must have a WARRANT!…[4th amendment] note; The SHERIFF in your county has a DUTY to protect you above all else , and that means Anyone who attempts trespass!

Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943) No State can convert a Secured liberty!! And force you to get a license and pay a fee.

Jurisdiction if all 4 legs were not there …the table falls down …in otherwords if a summary judgement against you did not have 4 legs IT falls under the Law of VOIDS… ripped off by the child support orders! Scam!.. Ect.???

Law of VOIDS…Subject Matter Jurisdiction…4 Legs = [1] 2 people opposing, [2] SMJ = Fact Finding ( Where are the facts before this court as to the claim against me?) [3] Sworn witnesses… Affidavits! ……challenge them!, are they sworn!? [4] Witnesses!! Petition for removal of summary judgements against you that don’t have 4 legs …because THEY are VOID.

Couldn't DISagree with this post more. The only part I agree with is the importance of reserving your rights, the rest is crap, especially the parts about the police and the courts having a duty to protect you. Marc Stevens does a wonderful job of busting those myths in Adventures in Legal Land, with plenty of "case law" to back it up,.....not that "case law" means a damn thing to any of us. I have numerous instances of my own where my sheriff refused to protect me, let alone return a letter or a phone call, or meet with me. Sheriff's are are no longer protectors of the people, they are politicians. They absolutely do NOT have to protect you, and I can assure you, they won't.
Reply With Quote