View Single Post
  #5  
Old 02-01-2008, 01:28 PM
FreeFromContract's Avatar
FreeFromContract FreeFromContract is offline
Mental Jujitsu
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJWILSON6200
NOTES of LAW

“ ALL RIGHTS RESERVED “ Speak up! And don’t sign anything without attaching this to your signature!! The Law Enforcement system PRESUMES that YOU are a 14th amendment citizen. THE UCC 1 –207 (1-308) Slams their presumption and now….

The CONSTITUTION is an enforceable contract…..IN YOUR FAVOR! …And the 7th amendment is the kingpin from which it swings! So Demand a 7th amendment JURY to try the FACTS!

Platsky v. CIA 953 F.2d. 25
THE JUDGE IS GURIADIAN of YOUR LIBERTYS!!…If you are forced to go to court tell the judge this, right up front, before ANYTHING else!

Cohen v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821)
That “THE FEDERIALIST PAPERS” [came from the primary objective of THE MAGNA CARTA … to protect the people from summary judgements, that is, you being ripped off…no due process]…are THE EXACT RECORD of the intent of the lawmakers.
[Intent of the lawmaker IS the LAW!]

Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 , 6 S. Ct. 524
The Courts Duty is to Protect You.

United States v. Breyer , 829 F. Supp. 773
The Constitution is to be interpetded in favor of YOU! …Because you are the designated Benificary

Trinsey v. Pagliaro D.C.Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647. "Statements of counsel in brief or in argument are not facts before the court . Statements of counsel, in their briefs or their arguments are not sufficient for a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment.

Police Powers…are SUBJECT to the Constitution!!
9th and 10th Amendments Lock them out! From adding to remove rights! And this means Probable Cause….They must have a WARRANT!…[4th amendment] note; The SHERIFF in your county has a DUTY to protect you above all else , and that means Anyone who attempts trespass!

Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943) No State can convert a Secured liberty!! And force you to get a license and pay a fee.

Jurisdiction if all 4 legs were not there …the table falls down …in otherwords if a summary judgement against you did not have 4 legs IT falls under the Law of VOIDS… ripped off by the child support orders! Scam!.. Ect.???

Law of VOIDS…Subject Matter Jurisdiction…4 Legs = [1] 2 people opposing, [2] SMJ = Fact Finding ( Where are the facts before this court as to the claim against me?) [3] Sworn witnesses… Affidavits! ……challenge them!, are they sworn!? [4] Witnesses!! Petition for removal of summary judgements against you that don’t have 4 legs …because THEY are VOID.

Nice collection of cites RJ, provided their intent is as you've paraphrased. Let me emphasize a couple with commentary:

Quote:
Cohen v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821)
That “THE FEDERIALIST PAPERS” [came from the primary objective of THE MAGNA CARTA … to protect the people from summary judgements, that is, you being ripped off…no due process]…are THE EXACT RECORD of the intent of the lawmakers.
[Intent of the lawmaker IS the LAW!

The founder's had very specific foundations in law (common law) and current events (they had just kicked the King's A$$) in debating the content of the constitution. There was heavy reliance in the common law as it stood at that time! Don't let some of the ghouls on this site pull one over on you. Most (all?) of the Constitutions of the 50 States have a clause concerning Common Law.

Don't let the ghouls tell you the common law is changing. It's NOT! It is was well established by Blackstone exactly what the common laws consisted. The boundaries and function of the common law was well defined at the time the Constitution was signed.


Quote:
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943) [No State can convert a Secured liberty!! And force you to get a license and pay a fee.]
This is the roadblock to Shoonra's misguided efforts to illustrate that nobody has a right to travel in their own private automobile without a license. No matter how hard she tries to twist it, there was nowhere in the common law that provided for licensing of anyone (even those in transporting goods/merchandise in horse drawn carts or wagons in commerce) on the king's roads.

The common conveyance back then was on carts and wagons by horses, on horse and by foot and of course boat or canoe by water.

The common conveyances today are much different, but there can be no licensing requirement to travel in one's private capacity as illustrated by the above (and many other) cites (many of which are available on SJ).
__________________
Liberty: Freedom from restraint and the power to follow one's own will to choose a course of conduct. Liberty, like freedom, has its inherent restraint to act without harm to others and within the accepted rules of conduct for the benefit of the general public.
Reply With Quote