Jetgraphics is right- the difference is about "private property" vs "real or personal". This was confirmed for me in some research I did last night under a certain u.State laws in re: real estate taxes.
Over and over again the tax is declared to apply to "real property", and loudly excludes "property not subject". Why mention this possibility if there is no such thing? Besides "not subject", there are also "exempt" items- so the two concepts are different from one another.
So "quit claim" the registered title (after fully securing in every other way the ownership- ucc liens, mortgage, other liens etc),
w/o recorded transfer to any new owner. There will be an argument from the deed office as they will want a "transfer tax" form filed- but this is no transfer. This is "quit claim".
The property is protected from being sold out from under by the fact that the last holder of public record has filed a "quit claim". Any subsequent act by the same under that claim would then be void (and a fraud!).
Then record, not a deed, but a Notice- of lawful claim for at least $21 gold.
There are also a list of exemptions that could be claimed, enough that there has got to be some chance of success there anyway.
Perhaps the 'exemption' claimed should be"private property"- but really this an exclusion so has to be established differently.
immune from collection in Texas:
http://www.suijuris.net/forum/taxati...tml#post130512