We reject Skurdal's argument that he is a "free man" exempt from the laws because he has "no contracts" with either the state or federal governments...No persons in Montana may exempt themselves from any law simply by declaring they do not consent to it applying to them...Accepting Skurdal's assertion of exempt status is an invitation to anarchy. We decline that invitation. - State v. Skurdal, Supreme Court of Montana, 235 Mont. 291, 767 P.2d 304 at 308 (1988).
----------------
I don't know anything about the Skurdal case but based on what the court said I would agree. This is b/c it seems as though Skurdal merely "proclaimed" he didn't "consent". Skurdal probably didn't change his actual relationship with the authorities he was seeking to separate himself from. Based on that, I would say this particular case is "Quatloosie"
