There are 46 audio files. Which one are you specifically talking about?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by andrewmitch
One thing Bill claim's is very interesting. That is that things like the Social Security Card, Licenses, etc are considered to be "Narrow Contracts"; that is they only apply to the specific item for which the license was issued. If it ends up being a binding contract for something more, then the party is commiting fraud b/c there was not disclosure. In other words, you could still be in the system for certain items but challenge jurisdiction for others.
Speaking of jurisdiction, he is indicating that we aren't so much challenging jurisdiction but we are challenging authority and when they over-step their authority we can sue for damamges.
I am not sure how to apply this to the property tax issue but I am sure there is a connection.
|
__________________
United States never held any municipal sovereignty, jurisdiction, or right of soil in Alabama or any of the new states which were formed ... The United States has no Constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty or eminent domain, within the limits of a state or elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted ...
[Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S. 212 (1845)]
|