Notwithstanding distractions about birth certificates, it sounds like your actions are based in a hypothecation (sometimes called DirectTreasury Account) based on birth certificates in general.
Quote:
|
He does not have a birth certificate and this is a problem because he wants to file a UCC 1 and secure a birth certificate number in his collateral listing on the UCC 1
|
Or please explain, what is the value of a birth certificate # even if a number is "secured" by lien. My evaluation of the thread is that UCC/Strawman Redemption doctrine says that there is an account being secured by this
birth certificate number.
I have never really believed any of this to be so, but may have given that impression because I would encourage people like Sheisaceo recently and many more over the years, to pursue some sort of evidence and even a transcript etc. where there has been any success. Nada! Nothing! ZIP!
I apologize about distracting from the real point about your friend's birth certificate but if these things really have hypothecated securities attached, then he abandoned filling in that crucial support stone in the zigurat on the backside of the dollar bill - way back when he left Cuba.
He made the hypothecation worthless and basically failed to provide his life's substance to fill in the mortar - the
slime.
Quote:
Gen 11:1 And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.
Gen 11:2 And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.
Gen 11:3 And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them throughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for mortar.
|
He has rendered any Cuban investors fools by being absent there to produce and supposes that by getting a US citizen birth certificate now, this late in the game, he can encourage investors on a liened asset?
Maybe I am not looking at this properly - but in about any language, that is fraud.
Regards,
David Merrill.