If the matter does go forward you will want to know the exact definition of the charge.
(look it up here on the 'net, see
www.findlaw.com )
Then you need to check the actual claim made by "El Jerko Bigotito" and see if it really matches up with every element of the statutory definition.
Many times, for example, they will charge "PI" without even bothering to say that you were helplessly drunk in the street, or blocking a public way, which is often the definition. This creates a "failure to state an offense"- the claims made just don't equal the offense charged.
If this is the case then you ask for dismissal: "lack of subject-matter jurisdiction".
Corporate, sovereign or otherwise, the fact is there are laws and if these are the source of the jurisdiction then the process is limited by the same. "PI" isn't whatever someone wants to feel it is; this is a specific, legal, established item in the codes with a strict definition.
People confuse the democratic process with the absolute sovereignty of applicable law.
Law is not a series of random speculative opinions.