View Single Post
  #9  
Old 03-10-2008, 08:23 AM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is online now
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by rushpat
Here's something interesting. While perusing the IRM online for the 2797 letter, I found this page:



---LINK---



and noticed something at least a little interesting:



Processing Balance Due (TDA) and Return Delinquency (TDI) Undelivered



Destroy all notices marked with "Refused" or "Unclaimed."



Hmm... perhaps I should repair the letter and return "refused"? Didn't I read something about this in another thread?



However, this is a letter, not a notice.


Indeed, a simple R4C will be promptly destroyed? Pay attention to the "clerk instruction".

Thanks for that snippet. That explains why the agents just keep on sending more notices. And make no mistake - that letter is a notice. Like everything in admiralty - no rebuttal means you agree. If you acquiesce you accept your time period to form your own affidavit.

Quote:
Exhibit 5.18.2-3 (01-01-2008)
A6020(b) 1085 Ltr.

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SB/SE Internal Revenue Service Ogden, UT 84201-0048 Department of the Treasury Employer Identification Number: Forms: Tax Period(s) Ended:
Dear Person to Contact: A6020b Representative Contact Telephone Number: 801-620-4647 (6am-4pm Mountain Time) Fax Number: 801-620-4750
We have reviewed your tax records and found no record of you filing the tax returns identified above. We believe you are liable and have prepared a tax return for the tax period/s in question. If you agree that the tax liability shown is correct, please sign each form and return it to us. If you do not agree with our findings, you have 45 days (90 days if this letter is addressed outside the United States) to do one of the following:
1.Prepare and sign tax returns which you believe show



Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S. That link: http://www.irs.gov/irm/part5/ch18s21.html

is not working for me. I tried searching for some of the "refused" verbiage but had no hits.
Attached Files
File Type: doc generic counterclaim - sanitized.doc (54.5 KB, 14 views)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
It is worth noting that the fealty to the Pope, which you cited for its explicit mention of the Templar abbey in Dover, is the legal basis for the invalidation of the Magna Carta after it was sealed at Runnymede.
During discussion about the Treaty of 1213 and the Magna Charta (1215).

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/medieval/magframe.htm
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/john1a.html
Reply With Quote