Interesting that on 3/21 Freebeme edited out a large chunk of that insulting post. Me discovering that this morning when getting back to more comment.
I believe that I may have given Freebeme a contact number through PM or something like that. He or she sounded interested in the Libel of Review and even asked how often I drive my car... then never got back. That happens a lot. [Incidently, I think it wise to consider an ebike conversion and 31 day bus pass. You can get around much more efficiently and even comfortably - considering you will probably be sitting in your desk chair or pounding framing nails for 10-15 hours a week just to spin those wheels you like to think you "own" anyway. Sadly Americans will allow that car and operating it to drive them into foreclosure on their homes without ever calculating the overall household budget picture.]
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ll_ebiking.wmv
What bothers me is that the common law right to refuse is under attack. It has been established over the years and I am sure Shoonra would produce many cases for us, that when one pushes somebody into a contract agreement, there is allowed a reasonable time to change mind about it and rescind. People have the right to consider and discuss with spouse, or other counsel before a salespitch accepted, becomes a binding contract.
It may have been a mood, or something I missed in our "interview" that caused Freebeme to lash out. It would seem he or she has rethought it and decided boiling over my next to nothing local transportaion strategy was not really basis for insult.
However it is a good lesson for me to stick to referrals from current suitors. Once people understand how to exercise the right of R4C, and to plant evidence in a proper repository they tend to get enough more control over pushy contract offers and their friends and relatives call me
ready to go. My experience with drafting remedy for Internet acqaintances is that there is just too much convincing - this request for treatises on Refusal for Cause is a good case in point.
I admit it is a little lazy not to find cases in courts recognizing that somebody can change their mind in a reasonable amount of time. I recall reading about it in depth around
Presentments about the UCC in the adoption here in Colorado.
http://michie.lexisnexis.com/colorad...templates&2.0#
But that was a long time ago and the General Assembly bless thier attorner hearts has a way of weeding out terms that help liberate people from the assumption and color of law. Try looking for "refuse" "right to refuse" "three days" "72 hours" as last time I looked more recently, I could only find vague implication that presentments are voluntary and may be refused at all. Whereas originally it was very clear by statute that one has 72 hours to consider Presentments.
Since Freebeme has reconsidered taking a phone call's information and publishing it in a way that deteriorates Suijuris members' understanding of right of refusal, I may reconsider my stance about never giving out contact numbers here in the future.
Regards,
David Merrill.