|
more update
The suitor served a "common law" subpoena on the 16th, in preparation for a foreclosure hearing on the 22nd. When he got to the hearing with his witness, he found that his home had been foreclosed upon on the 17th - the day after the subpoena was served. The clerk of court was denying any appeal process?
The suitor/homeowner expressed for the first time, that Robert Erler had no oath published and this got his appeal into the district court. Something it also got him was another foreclosure hearing before Erler which I knew nothing about until weeks later.
I would have implored that since Erler's court had been proven vacant, he should not appear. But he did. And he interviewed with the witness by phone - who of course did not supply the note as subpoenaed. The witness denied ever getting the Letter of Credit (attached) in payment of the home. He cited the Registered Mail return reciept and the witness then admitted to having received payment. He was still awaiting that transcript from the clerk of court...
Regards,
David Merrill.
|