View Single Post
  #17  
Old 03-24-2008, 11:45 AM
David Merrill's Avatar
David Merrill David Merrill is offline
Come and Get Some!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Colorado.
Posts: 6,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeme
You never gave me a contact number. Why would I ask for one?

I have never not been able to pay and I am more than eager to show up for court.

Your entire system is alleged by me to be fraud and nothing more.

Simple fact is you cannot provide an essay or any rational thought laid to paper. You can only fool people into believing your scheme by maintaining a banter dialog rather than some real writing on the subject.

Your refusal is faulty in and out.

The system you call "my system" is the American system of law.

It is based on the Judiciary Act of 1789 and its 'saving to suitors' clause. The remedy written into the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (attached) has been supplementing the avoidance of Refusal for Cause for several years now. Some suitors began doing that as early as 2003.

Since you did not get any information you post by interview with me, I am left assuming you are a Quatloser. Good luck around here with that.



Regards,

David Merrill.


P.S.

Quote:
Your refusal is faulty in and out.

Refused for Cause.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	12 USC 411 pre 1934.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	112.8 KB
ID:	4740  
Attached Files
File Type: doc generic counterclaim - sanitized.doc (54.5 KB, 3 views)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoonra
It is worth noting that the fealty to the Pope, which you cited for its explicit mention of the Templar abbey in Dover, is the legal basis for the invalidation of the Magna Carta after it was sealed at Runnymede.
During discussion about the Treaty of 1213 and the Magna Charta (1215).

http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/medieval/magframe.htm
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/john1a.html
Reply With Quote