Quote:
|
Originally Posted by quasimodo
Sometimes I feel like a broken record.
LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION!!!
NO DAMAGE> NO CRIME> NO JURISDICTION
NO LOSS> NO CRIME> NO JURISDICTION
NO COMPLAINING PARTY> NO CRIME> NO JURISDICTION
NO WITNESS> NO CRIME> NO JURISDICTION
|
Moishanb brought up a good point. The black-robed actor is an attorney fully capable of simply representing the state or city for the prosecuting witness.
Quasimodo;
Your post reminds me of one fellow who filed Charles Weisman's brief from
The Authority of Law. The
judge came back from recess and said, "This court has no subject matter jurisdiction."
Jim, who was approaching 90, stood at the podium processing this as quickly as he could at that age. The "judge" asked, "Did you understand what I just said?"
Jim started into Plan B which was a constitutional argument and therefore appeared and was shot down, convicted. Later I told him that was his queue to leave the courthouse. He tried to get the transcript and the tape recording was damaged at that place in the transcript where the judge admitted no subject matter jurisdiction.
Carlos;
If you have R4C'd the cause, forget about it. If you appear, forget about the R4C. If you appear because you are sure you can win; get back to us on that please.
Regards,
David Merrill.