Important point QM. Thanks for letting us know.
If you would have built a record in the cognizance of the US government somehow, you would be just like a "suitor" - a court of competent jurisdiction.
Indeed Courttroubles;
If one is ready to accept there is no Article III judiciary in operation down at the federal courthouse, then one is ready to sign and seal their own true judgment Libel of Review. One couple, the wife seemed ready to step up but her husband was still looking for some attorney somewhere who would not stab them in the back (again). I left them with advice to find out who the attorney was who moved Robert Boyko:
http://www.ohnd.uscourts.gov/Clerk_s...forclosure.pdf
I implored they find out how much he would charge. But here is a recent email:
Quote:
From: rivera office [mailto:edrivera@edrivera.com]Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 5:52 AMTo: edrivera@edrivera.comSubject:
Stay away from anyone who thinks Congress holds the key to happiness. Congress has nothing to do with 'this Constitution." Article Iis not part of 'this Constitution.' Edit the Constitution forthe United States of America and find all references to "thisConstitution." "This Constitution" appears in every Article exceptArticle I. Article I is not part of "this Constitution," therefore Congress has authority only in federal territory.
Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera
|
The key is understanding Congress is the Administrator of the US court system. When the clerk of court was falsely branding suitors:
http://friends-n-family-research.inf..._falsified.jpg
I sent $350 to the Speaker with a summons for Manspeaker to answer to the charge of falsifying court documents:
http://friends-n-family-research.inf..._corrected.jpg
Notice the dates.
But as long as the husband is looking to saboutage the court system inherent in that household, I will not be accepting the Internet referral to walk this couple through LoR.
Regards,
David Merrill.