I am growing impatient as I was hoping Shoonra would give me something to write this explanation upon.
What would compose a bogus lien - against an IRS agent? One that would allow recourse like Shoonra is talking about?
That deserves careful examination. In this case it is a bogus Notice of Federal Tax Lien that has caused the suitor grief and caused him to find this IRS agents home properties and place a lien on everything he owns...
So what determines or would possibly determine the lien the suitor has placed on the IRS agent is a "false lien"?
That is the most important question now, isn't it?
A child can see the simplicity if one can comprehend the remedy provided in the Federal Reserve Act itself. (attached) And that remedy is still in full force and effect today understanding that US notes are lawful money and FRNs are redeemable in lawful money today, as US notes still in circulation - in the form of FRNs since 1971.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...1----000-.html
Just that US notes are not redeemable in gold since 1933.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/ht...000-notes.html
Now one has remedy. Redeem lawful money. Do not accept (endorse) private credit from the Fed. If you do you are requesting and accepting the
elastic currency of the Fed (see the Title of the 1913 Federal Reserve Act attached).
If you are carrying FRNs instead of US notes in the form of FRNs and you buy something, the Treasury holds a First Lien against whatever you purchased with their credit should you come into a dispute about filing a Return of Income, a voluntary contract you have already agreed to. This is why people (in Oregon a whole group is actively trying to influence the county clerk and recorder there) get so confused about the Federal Tax Lien being in the form of a Notice. They bitch and moan that the NOFTL is not a Lien -
It is only a Notice!!
The lien was always there - inherent in the private credit a taxpayer's property, house or whatever was purchased with on the presumption that the paychecks were never redeemed in lawful money - only endorsed over to the Fed for private credit!
This is why Shoonra will never and has never answered my simple Question:
When did Congress ever decide to take US notes out of circulation?
http://friends-n-family-research.inf...ll_juliard.jpg
The Treasury decided that FRNs will function as US notes in 1971 and that is why UNITED STATES NOTES at the top of the currency is rare. But non-endorsed paychecks are paid in US notes that look just like FRNs.
The reason that the suitor's lien is valid is that he has been redeeming lawful money. The reason his lien is valid is that the IRS lien - evidenced in the NOFTL against him for the rediculous amount of $1.5M is the bogus lien.
Right Shoonra?
Regards,
David Merrill.