Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lawdog
My purpose is to keep a few people from drinking the kool-aid, so to speak. Posting proof that certain theories don't work in the real world is enough to convince some people not to play with fire.
|
Thank you for the clear and direct response. You are saying you want to control other people's freedom to chose. You are also saying that beliefs are controlable, since you are posting here. This is my point exactly, and thank you for supporting my belief(or what you might call theory, since beliefs are just beliefs). Yet how ironic that beliefs are the most important approach to controlling people. Isn't that why you are here? To protect a few people from their beliefs? Your way is better, so to speak? By pointing out the flaws in one's beliefs.
I have no doubt, and do believe that there are erroneous methods posted on this and many other forums. But, doesn't each man/woman have the right to decide, and the right to make their own judgments. OOPS, I already know your answer, men and women can't make their own judgments, cuz judgments can only be made by a black robed guy/girl in a court AT LAW(close to but not law). You have 'case law' and codes to prove it, don't you. I think you would better yourself by reading one of my favorite cases, HALE v. HINKEL. This case supports my belief(you call it theory), although it is simply caselaw.
As always, good day to you LAWDOG