Quote:
|
Originally Posted by farmer_giles_of_ham
Now why on earth would you have done that...knowing full well that a fellow-man is under attack by the rabid lawdogs out there; that there is no justice to be had at any price; that the only purpose of the whole charade is to cook up some fresh meat for sacrifice...
|
Okay.. so you don't think I've lost my mind.. I'll clarify my statement. I am unfamilar with the case, but from the article that LD posted it seems this guy was tilting at windmills and was very combative in his approch to the situation. If he was tried as a felon, then at least 20 people heard the case evidence before it could have gone to trial and a 3/4 majority voted to send it on to the judge. If I was on the grand jury for that case, I may have been able to ask questions and present a compelling argument to the other jurors to drop the case.
But I was not there and was basing my theoretical vote on the article text alone. My main basis was not his license status or his government view but the fact he was carrying a conceled weapon on public school grounds and his responses that were cited in the article. If he had left the gun at home...then my viewpoint would have been different based on the article text.
My opinion is that the outcome and actions of the cops would have been different too. They viewed him as a threat to the safety of the public at large at that school. And his attitude toward "Johnny cops" didn't serve his position well toward his beliefs. He made several bad choices that made a little thing .. very big. Cops don't interpret the law they are "supposed" to be keeping the public safe. All the cops saw is a guy with a gun and a bad attitude at a school function and they freaked out.
Also his attitude once in court was a little weird too..
What are you saying when you say “guilty”? Isn’t this a “bad” thing? As you well know, all crimes are commercial liabilities.
Instead of saying “I am guilty”, you are REALLY saying “I am payment”.
You are saying “the debtor is chargeable and I, as the creditor am going to pay with my signature as payment, just like all the other credit that I have created with my signature, which the municipalities and corporations have been capitalizing on up to this point.
If he was "all there" .. instead of answering the plea "the charges were bricks in the road from freedom to tyranny" he would have just pled guilty and created a bond for the payment and have been done with it.
My only reason for jumping in on that post was the title .. and the author .. because an Affidavit with supporting evidence is everything it's cracked up to be.
..J