|
Your true colors are clearly evident...
Shoonra, The answer to my question, post #22 (W/1st hand knowledge) is...
"Nolle prosequi".
Again, you make assumptions that instantly fall by the wayside. I would never admit to driving a vehicle for obvious reasons known to those that are aware (word art).
In fact, trial will not happen(not yet anyway), and rarely was there a need to even speak. (serious repercussions should they proceed.)
Also, your claim "that the unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle on the public highways has NEVER been held to be one of the rights, privileges or immunities secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States.", lacks merit.
Perhaps you should brush up on the 9th & 10th amendments to the constitution.
Also, be aware of the jurisdictional status of the "person/party" accused in the case.
This quote comes to mind, "It is better to be silent and thought of as ignorant than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt!" (author unkown.)
|